After a two-week medical malpractice trial, Spencer Bomar and Trisha Godsey obtained a defense verdict in Gwinnett County for an emergency medicine physician. 

Spencer Bomar recently had a case dismissed on plaintiff's failure to comply with OCGA 9-11-9.1.

Heather Miller and Spencer Bomar obtained a defense verdict in favor of a family practice physician in a wrongful death medical malpractice case after a one-week trial in Cobb County.

Spencer Bomar and Colleen Callaghan obtained a defense verdict for an obstetrician after trying a three-week long birth injury case in Fulton County.

Dan McGrew and Spencer Bomar obtained summary judgment for a radiology practice and its radiologists after the motion was successfully argued by Andrew Bagley.

Spencer Bomar and Dan McGrew moved to exclude one of Plaintiff’s expert witnesses in the trial court, specifically an internal medicine doctor who tried to provide standard of care and causation opinions against an infectious disease doctor.

The Court of Appeals of Georgia affirmed the grant of summary judgment obtained at the trial court level by Spencer Bomar and Trisha Godsey.

Defense verdict in favor of a general surgeon in a week-long medical malpractice trial in Gwinnett County. The case involved a delayed bowel perforation complication days after performance of a rectosigmoid colon resection. The surgeon was alleged to have failed to recognize signs of infection in the post-operative period in order to timely diagnose the problem.

Spencer Bomar presented “Cooperating Co-Defendants” at the Georgia Society for Healthcare Risk Management’s (GSHRM) Annual Conference.

Bomar, Spencer A. (January 2015), Practical Tip: Did the Affordable Care Act End the Collateral Source Rule?, Law Journal Newsletters, Product Liability Law & Strategy.

Summary judgment on issue of causation in a pharmacy case alleging professional negligence and RICO allegations.

Medical malpractice action was dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with 2007 version of O.C.G.A.§9-11-9.1. The dismissal was upheld on appeal. Peck v. Bishop, 668 S.E.2d 558.

Arbitration victory for fire suppression sprinkler system contractor involving a department store’s large property damage claim.

Spencer Bomar obtained summary judgment for nephrologists named in a case alleging medical negligence related to wound care and decubitus ulcers in the ICU setting. The nephrologists asserted that their role in treatment did not include skin assessment or wound care and that all care related to the patient’s renal function met the standard of care. Judgment was entered in their favor.

Spencer Bomar obtained a voluntary dismissal in air compressor explosion case causing catastrophic burn injuries when proven defendant did not manufacture, but only distributed the component part alleged to have caused the explosion.

Spencer Bomar and Sam Britt represented a physician who was alleged to have been deliberately indifferent to a prisoner’s serious medical need in violation of the prisoner’s constitutional rights.

Spencer Bomar tried a week-long medical malpractice trial in Athens-Clarke County. The case involved a cervical spine surgery in a patient who experienced a subsequent kyphotic deformity and later developed neurological deficits. The case resulted in a defense verdict for the defendant neurosurgeon.

Dan McGrew and Spencer Bomar obtained a defense verdict in favor of an internal medicine physician in a case alleging that the discontinuation of a sub-acute rehab patient’s Heparin medication was premature and that the patient died of an acute pulmonary embolism as a result.

Spencer Bomar and Dan McGrew obtained a defense verdict in favor of a plastic surgeon alleged to have failed to timely diagnose a rare, invasive fungal infection called Mucormycosis in a patient who died as a result. The trial lasted 7 days. Jury, after deliberation, found in favor of the Defendant physician.

Dan McGrew and Spencer Bomar obtained a defense verdict in favor of a urological surgeon who allegedly failed to intervene as the assistant, but more experienced surgeon, to prevent a surgical complication during a nephrectomy caused by another urological surgeon.